AI × ADVANCED MANUFACTURING

AI across nine process areas

Verifiable frontier architectures, benchmarked and deployed on the tool floor.

POSITIONING

How we approach AI

The value of AI in semiconductor manufacturing comes from turning sensor, metrology and inspection data into decisions you can act on.

BETTER treats published industry and academic architectures as benchmarks, then selects the method that suits each process scenario.

The architectures and quantitative results listed below come from third-party research, used as technical reference benchmarks and not measurements of our own.

Abstract composition of a wafer overlaid with neural network nodes, deep blue ground with fine spectral gradients

THREE PILLARS

Three pillars across all areas

Every process area shares the same methodological backbone.

Digital Twin

A virtual counterpart of each tool, chamber and line, synchronized with real state and ready for scenario simulation.

Typical uses: condition change rehearsal, maintenance scheduling, post-relocation restart validation

Physics Simulation

Plasma, heat transfer, fluid and ion transport models predict how the process will behave.

Typical uses: etch rate, thickness uniformity, temperature field, dopant profile

LithoDreamer / ILT

Generative methods and inverse lithography correction address patterning and optical proximity effects.

Typical uses: mask correction, OPC iteration, pattern risk prediction

Three-column abstract illustration pairing digital twin, physics simulation and generative lithography on a cool gray ground

BENCHMARK ARCHITECTURES

AI benchmark architectures

Everything below is third-party published research, used as deployment benchmarks.

AI benchmark architectures: domain, representative model (year), core architecture, input features, output and evaluation metrics, and key quantitative results
Domain Model (year) Core architecture Input features Output / metrics Key quantitative results
Wafer map defect classification G2LGAN + CNN (2025) Two-stage GAN augmentation + MobileNetV2 Wafer map images (class-imbalanced data) Accuracy / F1 / 1-NN (generation quality) Acc 98.39%, F1 93.01%
Wafer map defect classification CNN-ESN (2026) ResNet34 + echo state network Noisy wafer maps Acc (robustness at σ=0.1 noise) Clean 94.74%, noisy 87.30%
SEM defect classification IBM ASMC (2025) ViT (DINOv2) + semi-supervised SEM images (<15 per class) Classification accuracy >90% (few-shot)
Yield prediction PDF Exensio (2025) XGBoost + PCA In-line defect, metrology, electrical test, FDC Die/wafer pass-fail, precision/recall Tunable threshold balances overkill/underkill
Yield root cause TSMC smart manufacturing RNN (time-series FDC) + federated learning Tool sensor time series, inspection data Yield-impacting defect prediction accuracy ~92% (28–3nm), escape rate -15%
Thermal simulation surrogate DeepOHeat-v1 (2025) DeepONet + KAN + GMRES refinement Power map / floorplan (physics-informed training, no simulation data) MAPE, training time, memory MAPE 0.035%, training -62×, memory -31×
Joint thermal-IR ThermEDGe/IREDGe Encoder-Decoder CNN Time-varying power maps, PDN density IR error (mV), temperature contour Average IR error 0.053mV
2.5D electrothermal co-design TTSV-HMO (2025) Equivalent model + hybrid metaheuristic (PSO+SA) TTSV pitch, chiplet placement, power density Temperature/impedance MAE, fitness Temperature MAE 0.35%, impedance 3.97%
Static IR drop MaxViT/U-Net (2026) MaxViT encoder + U-Net/FPN decoder Resistance, current and power pad maps (SPICE rendered to images) MAE, F1 (>90% peak hotspots), inference time MAE < 15×10⁻⁵V, 10–30× faster than NGSPICE
Static IR drop ICCAD'23 winning flow ConvNeXtV2-Nano + UPerNet Per-layer resistance maps + effective distance maps MAE (mV), F1 MAE 0.075mV, F1 0.56
Dynamic IR drop PDNNet (2024) Heterogeneous GNN (PDNGraph) + CNN PDN structure graph + dynamic current maps NMAE, speedup NMAE improved 39.3%, 545× speedup
Dynamic IR drop Dual-path spatiotemporal model (DATE'25) 3D SW-MSA Transformer Time-window decomposed power maps (internal/switching/leakage/toggle rate) Hotspot prediction accuracy Outperforms 2D/3D-CNN and recurrent U-Net
Electromigration Dey et al. (2020) 10-layer NN regression + logistic classifier J, L, T, IR drop, MTTF labels (KLU + Black) R², AMSE, failed-segment detection Large speedup, MTTF comparable to exact models
Electromigration BPINN-EM-Post (2025) Bayesian PINN Korhonen PDE physics residual + observations Uncertainty quantification, lifetime distribution Overcomes PINN overfitting, supports multi-segment lines
ATPG InF-ATPG (2025) FFR partitioning + QGNN + DQN Logic state, SCOAP controllability/observability Backtracks, fault coverage, UFP Backtracks -55.06%, UFP 0.50%
ATPG (commercial) Synopsys TSO.ai AI setup tuning (black-box optimization) Design characteristics, ATPG engine behavior, constraints Pattern count, coverage, convergence iterations Patterns -20–25% (over 50% in some cases)
BIST enhancement LITE (2025) Standard-cell scan enhancement + SCOAP analysis Netlist hypergraph, CC0/CC1/CObs Pattern count, random pattern coverage ATPG patterns -31%, improved RPR coverage
KGD/outlier detection GPR/RevTransC/conformal prediction GPR spatial modeling, unsupervised transform, conformal QR + CatBoost Wafer-level parametric test data, WAT AUROC, DPPM, Vmin interval coverage Outperforms DPAT; Vmin ~90% coverage guarantee
Test time GPU real-time adaptive test GPU-accelerated ML (production deployment) Real-time test data stream Test time, defect coverage maintained Blackwell production: -25% test time
Layout hotspot Explainable GAT (ASP-DAC'26) Graph attention network (8 heads) Layout graph (5-dim node features, adjacency matrix) Recall, false alarm rate, explainability 5–12× less memory than image-based methods
e-Beam review SEMVision H20 (2025) Deep learning image classification (in-fab retraining) CFE e-beam images Review speed, real vs. nuisance defect discrimination 3× speed, deployed at 2nm/GAA customers

Sources are research and industry information published by third parties. BETTER uses them as the benchmark for the work it deploys, not measurements of our own.

PROCESS × AI

Process and AI mapping

The main deployment direction for each of the nine areas.

Process × AI matrix: process area, main benchmark architectures and deployment focus
Process area Main benchmark architectures Deployment focus
Photolithography LithoDreamer / ILT, explainable GAT (ASP-DAC'26) Generative mask correction, layout hotspot prediction, track digital twin
Dry & Plasma Etch Plasma physics simulation, TSMC RNN time-series FDC + federated learning Etch rate prediction, anomaly detection, endpoint determination
CVD DeepOHeat-v1 (2025), ThermEDGe/IREDGe Thermal field surrogate, thickness uniformity, chamber digital twin
Bake & Thermal DeepOHeat-v1 (2025), ThermEDGe/IREDGe Temperature contour prediction, thermal budget optimization, batch digital twin
Ion Implant Monte Carlo physics simulation, BPINN-EM-Post (2025), GPR Dopant profile simulation, uncertainty quantification, spatial outlier detection
CMP Polish physics simulation, PDF Exensio (2025), RNN time-series FDC Removal rate uniformity, yield prediction, consumable life trends
Wafer Clean & Dry IBM ASMC (2025) ViT, RNN time-series FDC Few-shot SEM defect classification, chemistry anomaly detection, particle root cause
Inspection & Test G2LGAN + CNN, CNN-ESN, SEMVision H20, GPU adaptive test, KGD conformal prediction, InF-ATPG Wafer map classification, e-beam review, test time optimization, outlier detection
Photomask LithoDreamer / ILT, MaxViT/U-Net, explainable GAT Pattern correction, risk area localization, writing digital twin

HOW WE DELIVER

Five steps to deployment

From scope definition to team handover, with verifiable metrics.

  1. 01

    Consultation

    Define the problem scenario and quantifiable targets, then assess data availability and the value of deployment.

  2. 02

    Data integration

    Consolidate tool sensor, process metrology and inspection data into one consistent data format.

  3. 03

    Model deployment

    Select and tune the benchmark architecture that fits the scenario, then build the training and inference flow.

  4. 04

    Validation

    Compare against the baseline on agreed metrics and confirm stability and repeatability.

  5. 05

    Training

    Hand over operating and interpretation methods so your team can run and maintain the system.

AI deployment dashboard style: five stage cards with metric figures, dark UI and spectrum-colored progress bars

GET IN TOUCH

Let's talk about your line

One point of contact from equipment selection through installation and AI integration.